Should toxicity testing be done in the real world experience of end use subjects of singly in rats?
Apr. 10th, 2009 at 2:40 AM
Toxicology testing massive fraud being committed
Related Tags : pollution, fashion, cancer, society, health
Are the protocols used to determine the health of human society adequate?
10 April 2009
If I add a soldier to a platoon with a secret new weapon, do I test the soldier by himself to see what impact he will have on the war, or do I test the platoon he is now a part of? Does the enemy experience a soldier or a platoon?
It has to be the platoon. Would I test these soldiers fighting a war against rats or humans? It has to be humans. Rats are not humans.
So it is with chemical testing. We are not exposed to chemicals in isolation. We are exposed to them in every conceivable mix and combination and at any time of our lives from the sperm and egg to old and crippled. And so they must be tested in combinations, like we test them with our bodies and through our milk secretions, our children’s bodies.
Suppose you want to add hypothetical AGENTGRINGOBAN (AGGB) to the crops of Latin America and Africa. Should AGGB be tested by itself on rats for carcinogencity, mutagenicity, teratogenecity, immunotoxicity? No. It should be tested in conjunction with all the pesticides and pollutants found in our foods and in the human body and in human foods and drinks and in mothers milk because that is who will be testing it as a consumer and that will be our life’s experience.
It needs to be added to the soup of chemicals that is made up of all cancer causing chemicals, mutagens, teratogens, immunotoxins and now by my analysis, methylagenic and acetylagenic chemicals to boot. How many ingredients in the soup we encounter in our lives?
I know the figure is somewhere between 10,000 and 10 million. A starting point might be all chemicals listed with IARC AND WITH EPA. And will rats tell the story of what it will do to humans. No. Only part of the story. What test could tell what it will do to humans?
Use it commercially for years and then find out. Well, we have been doing this soup experiment with humans for years. What has happened to cancer? The nearest I can find any evidence for and this is from very old recall is that cancer formed 5%-7% of the mortality of prechemical society from old data in Sri Lanka. It is now around 33% worldwide.
So lets add AGGB to the soup and see what it we can bump this 33% to. You see, we and all our fellow creatures are the experiment, and none of the controls are alive anymore. There is no place to run and no place to hide from industrial chemicals. They are found in fish in Canada’s most remote lakes, transported there by global air circulation and precipitated out in the rain.
Pesticides used in China on cotton are found in Canadian lakes and the Arctic and in people who eat those fish and in eagles and ospreys, and otter and mink and in bears and belugas and Orcas and seals.
We call it the good life. But how good is it really?
Jormawankenobe
Copyright 2009 J. Jyrkkanen. All rights reserved.
Tags:
pesticides carcinogens mutagens immunoto